FairXG
Football / Match analysis
Europa League 2026-11-26
Celta Rated 1492
--days
--hrs
--min
--sec
xG 0.95 – 1.92
Bournemouth Rated 1629
Celta 18% Fair odds 5.66Bookmakers 24%
Draw 23% Fair odds 4.38Bookmakers 26%
Bournemouth Model pick 60% Fair odds 1.68Bookmakers 50%
Add to slip: Celta Draw Bournemouth

The model and the bookmakers disagree. Bournemouth: 60% here, 50% with bookmakers. Bookmakers are usually sharper, so read a gap as a reason to look closer, not a tip.

Share of the pitch

Each side's win chance as territory
18% Home win 23% Draw 60% Away win

Who wins

CeltaDrawBournemouth
Goals model 18%23%60%
Elo model26%27%47%
Market (bookmakers' average, margin removed)24%26%50%
Best price on offer4.113.731.93

Why this prediction

What the model weighs, and what it leaves out
  • Overall strength Favours Bournemouth

    Bournemouth are rated 138 points above Celta (1629 to 1492), built from every result, weighted towards recent ones.

  • Home advantage Favours Celta

    Playing at home is worth about 65 rating points, which adds 9 points to Celta's chance of winning and takes the same from Bournemouth's.

  • Attack against defence Favours Bournemouth

    Expected goals 0.9 to 1.9. Celta score 1.1 a match against an average side (15th in La Liga); Bournemouth concede 0.8 (4th best defence in Premier League).

  • Last 5 matches Favours Bournemouth

    Celta LLDWW, barely moved; Bournemouth WWWWW, gained 52 rating points. Already counted in the ratings above.

  • Bookmakers' view Favours Celta

    Bookmakers rate Celta higher than the model does: Celta 24% against the model's 18%, Bournemouth 50% against 60%. Prices include team news the model can't see, and over thousands of past matches the market has been the more accurate, so where they differ, lean towards it.

    Not in the model

Rating, last 12 months

CeltaBournemouth
2025-11-061484–16292026-11-05

Are you 18 or over?

FairXG shows betting odds and is only for adults. Only stake what you can afford to lose.

By continuing you agree to the terms. See privacy.