FairXG
Football / Match analysis
Eliteserien 2026-11-07
Rosenborg Rated 1462
--days
--hrs
--min
--sec
xG 3.94 – 0.64
Start Rated 1280
Rosenborg Model pick 92% Fair odds 1.09Bookmakers 76%
Draw 6% Fair odds 16.58Bookmakers 15%
Start 2% Fair odds 43.10Bookmakers 9%
Add to slip: Rosenborg Draw Start

The model and the bookmakers disagree. Rosenborg: 92% here, 76% with bookmakers; A draw: 6% here, 15% with bookmakers. Bookmakers are usually sharper, so read a gap as a reason to look closer, not a tip.

Share of the pitch

Each side's win chance as territory
92% Home win 6% Draw 2% Away win

Who wins

RosenborgDrawStart
Goals model 92%6%2%
Elo model70%21%9%
Market (bookmakers' average, margin removed)76%15%9%
Best price on offer1.247.0013.00

Why this prediction

What the model weighs, and what it leaves out
  • Overall strength Favours Rosenborg

    Rosenborg are rated 182 points above Start (1462 to 1280), built from every result, weighted towards recent ones.

  • Home advantage Favours Rosenborg

    Playing at home is worth about 65 rating points, which adds 7 points to Rosenborg's chance of winning and takes the same from Start's.

  • Attack against defence Favours Rosenborg

    Expected goals 3.9 to 0.6. Rosenborg score 1.6 a match against an average side (2nd in Eliteserien); Start concede 2.6 (17th best defence).

  • Last 5 matches Favours Rosenborg

    Rosenborg WWWDW, gained 44 rating points; Start LWLLL, lost 30 rating points. Already counted in the ratings above.

  • Bookmakers' view Favours Start

    Bookmakers rate Start higher than the model does: Rosenborg 76% against the model's 92%, Start 9% against 2%. Prices include team news the model can't see, and over thousands of past matches the market has been the more accurate, so where they differ, lean towards it.

    Not in the model

Rating, last 12 months

RosenborgStart
2025-11-091280–14622026-11-01

Are you 18 or over?

FairXG shows betting odds and is only for adults. Only stake what you can afford to lose.

By continuing you agree to the terms. See privacy.